Rainforest pusta ko lud taskove. Jedan za drugim idu, ne moze u wc da se ode.

zato sto vecina radi wikipedija zadatke

jeli neko imao problem sa RF kad dobije notifikaciju da ima WORK klikne na istu i ne otvori novi tab sa taskom ?? evo nocas mi se to desava non stop. Nisam bio aktivan zadnjih mesec-dva pa reko da nisu bile neke drasticne promjene.

Updates to Step-Challenge Questions 2018-09-10 20:32:57, Kristen Hohenstein
Hello, everyone!
We’ve made some changes to the paid challenge question you are asked to answer during every job. You should expect to see this change reflected sometime later this week, possibly as early as today. Please read on for more details.
*How It Currently Is*
At the end of every Rainforest job, you are currently asked to answer a randomly generated Yes/No question. These questions exist to confirm that you are reading the instructions & are a human (not a robot). The question usually comes in the format of “Add 588 and 161 using a calculator. Is the sum 745?” or “Look at the computer. Are you a human?”
*How It Will Be (Later This Week)*
The current set of challenge questions described above will be removed and replaced with questions related to our testing rules. The format will remain the same — simple Yes/No questions that you can answer in a very short period of time.
The purpose of these challenge questions is still to confirm the criteria mentioned above, but now with the added benefit of reiterating simple, important aspects of our testing rules in order to maintain a high level of results quality for our clients. An example of how these questions will be formatted is “Recall Rule 2 about quotes & placeholders. Should you take capitalization differences into consideration when quotes are used in the instructions?”
It’s important to note that these questions were not phrased to be tricky. They are intended to be simple and straightforward, and you should be able to answer them easily if you have a good grasp of our testing rules. That being said, there is a penalty for getting them wrong just like before: we will reject the work. So make sure you read them carefully and don’t rush to an answer.
We will be adding additional questions to the rotation when we publish updates to our testing rules in upcoming weeks. The questions you’ll see published this week do not include future rule updates.
We hope this is a meaningful step toward a more holistic rule-education process at Rainforest QA. If you have feedback, please let us know what you think on the official forum thread or via the “Get Help” page of your portal profile using the “Other” category. We look forward to hearing from you.
Keep your eyes peeled for other updates from us in this realm, such as improvements to tool tips & the testing interface! Happy Testing ❤️

Bice ovde gomila problema

Zanimljiv update.

Moze li neko ko bude dobio ta pitanja, da ih postavi ovde i napise tacne odgovore ? Za nas koji ne citamo uputstva bas uvek ...

Garagos wrote: ... Za nas koji ne citamo uputstva bas uvek ...

Nisi ti dzabe miljenik foruma, nasmeja me naglas.
Samo udri sa pitanjima, objasnicemo sve sto umemo, samo ce u ovom slucaju to izgleda biti malo teze, obzirom na koncept saopstenja.
(P.S. Nevezano od ovoga - citaj Instrukcije da ti ne bih pretila opet da cu da te ugazim. )

Nole76 wrote: Updates to Step-Challenge Questions 2018-09-10 20:32:57, Kristen Hohenstein
Hello, everyone!
We’ve made some changes to the paid challenge question you are asked to answer during every job. You should expect to see this change reflected sometime later this week, possibly as early as today. Please read on for more details.
*How It Currently Is*
At the end of every Rainforest job, you are currently asked to answer a randomly generated Yes/No question. These questions exist to confirm that you are reading the instructions & are a human (not a robot). The question usually comes in the format of “Add 588 and 161 using a calculator. Is the sum 745?” or “Look at the computer. Are you a human?”
*How It Will Be (Later This Week)*
The current set of challenge questions described above will be removed and replaced with questions related to our testing rules. The format will remain the same — simple Yes/No questions that you can answer in a very short period of time.
The purpose of these challenge questions is still to confirm the criteria mentioned above, but now with the added benefit of reiterating simple, important aspects of our testing rules in order to maintain a high level of results quality for our clients. An example of how these questions will be formatted is “Recall Rule 2 about quotes & placeholders. Should you take capitalization differences into consideration when quotes are used in the instructions?”
It’s important to note that these questions were not phrased to be tricky. They are intended to be simple and straightforward, and you should be able to answer them easily if you have a good grasp of our testing rules. That being said, there is a penalty for getting them wrong just like before: we will reject the work. So make sure you read them carefully and don’t rush to an answer.
We will be adding additional questions to the rotation when we publish updates to our testing rules in upcoming weeks. The questions you’ll see published this week do not include future rule updates.
We hope this is a meaningful step toward a more holistic rule-education process at Rainforest QA. If you have feedback, please let us know what you think on the official forum thread or via the “Get Help” page of your portal profile using the “Other” category. We look forward to hearing from you.
Keep your eyes peeled for other updates from us in this realm, such as improvements to tool tips & the testing interface! Happy Testing ❤️

Bice ovde gomila problema

Hvala za info master Nole76, ubacila u Nove informacije temu.

Vezano za Highlight tvog posta - nisam tamo u temi (Nove informacije) znala ni odakle da pocnem sa skracenim prevodom.

"We will be adding additional questions to the rotation when we publish updates to our testing rules in upcoming weeks. The questions you’ll see published this week do not include future rule updates."
Dakle, vracamo se na 'momenat' gde ce nam pregledati uradjeno unazad, a 'pregledaci' ili nece imati pojma da li smo tacno odgovorili po Pravilima koja su bila na snazi u ko zna kom periodu, ili cemo naleteti na nekog tupavog 'pregledaca' koga je bas briga da na to obrati paznju. (Ova druga opcija je vezana za ideju da ce neko i da se seti da bi trebalo da se oznaci time-frame u odnosu na priznavanje/ne-priznavanje Testnih Pitanja.)

Celo objasnjenje ide cik-cak iz jedne krajnosti u drugu. I kako mi da znamo koji 'smer' da odaberemo: cik ili cak.

Ovo moze da se klasifikuje u fajl pod nazivom rapid-fire nonsense.
Koju god tacku da uzmes kao referentnu u tekstu, cik je povezi sa ma kojom drugom.

vrhunac RF-a.

hahahahahaha

Bice ovde dosta posla za pocetak.

A ovaj mi nikako ne ide sta je tacan odgovor.

Are you encouraged to use the SI feature if the step instructions could be broken into multiple steps?

A pogledajte u pravilniku:

If there are multiple questions asked and ALL of them are true, answer Yes, but click ‘Suggest Improvement’, select This step can be broken into multiple steps and leave a comment explaining to the user that it’s better to have one question per step. Be sure to be polite and courteous.

Ovo je i cista "igra" reci ali ajd sad znaj sta je tacan odgovor. Pravilnik kaze: "If there are multiple questions asked and ALL of them are true, answer Yes..." a gore pita: "Are you encouraged..."

Kakvo je vase iskustvo?

tacan odgovor je job abandoned


ako nisi siguran u svoj odgovor, napusti test. To je bolje resenje nego blokada. Ovo je najverovatnije ''izgovor'' da sto vise ljudi blokiraju, isto su uradili prosle godine u ovo vreme (ako se secate, RF forum septembar i oktobar prosle godine, svakog dana gomila ljudi blokirana, i to u periodu kada su testirali rad novih ''pregledaca'').

Ne radi se o igri reci vec o tome sto RF konstatno menja pravila, i kad ih ne menja, u zavisnosti od situacije, za jedno pravilo vazi i vise pravila. Na takav jedan neozbiljan nacin se ne moze unaprediti kvalitet rada testera, kao ni poboljsati krajnji rezultati za klijenta.

pupijevi wrote:
A ovaj mi nikako ne ide sta je tacan odgovor.

Are you encouraged to use the SI feature if the step instructions could be broken into multiple steps?

YES i teraj dalje

Recall Rule 2 about quotes & placeholders.
Are test authors allowed to use __ placeholders within quoted text?


Aj sto ne volim matematiku, ali ova pitanja... Covece !

Garagos wrote: Recall Rule 2 about quotes & placeholders.
Are test authors allowed to use __ placeholders within quoted text?


Aj sto ne volim matematiku, ali ova pitanja... Covece !

YES

Hvala cikalibi !

Iskreno, ja stvarno ne znam odgovore na sva ta pitanja, procitam vise puta, pa kako mi se cini da bi trebalo, tako pritisnem yes ili no, nije bilo gresaka za sada...

Upalim komp jutros, odem na RF profil, vidim BLOCKED vrišti sa ekrana. Razlog: You have failed to follow instructions on too many jobs. Ima li svrhe da se žalim?

Zao mi je.

Do sada, koliko ja znam, se pisalo na ovaj mejl:
tester@rainforestqa.com

E, sad, oni su vrlo 'poznati' po tome da ne odgovaraju ni na tikete ni na mejlove ni pribliznom brzinom kako to radi CS i F8.

Bilo je naloga koji su blokirani i posle odblokirani, nemoj to da te brine, postoji sansa. Ne znam sta je u pitanju i sta je razlog, tako da ne mogu da tvrdim sta ce da bude krajni rezultat.
U svakom slucaju, napisi im kao deo mejla i molibu da jos jednom pregledaju nalog i da zamolis za jos jednu sansu.
Moze da bude i neki sistemski bug.
Niko od nas ne zna sta se desava sa suprotne strane, nemamo nikakav uvid.

Ako treba pomoc za pisanje tiketa/mejla, javni.

P.S.
Molba za kolege za ispravku, ako je bolje pisati na neki drugi mejl, a ne na ovaj koji sam ja postovala ovde.

Hvala na informaciji.

Nema na cemu.
Nadam se da ce bude sve ok sa nalogom.

eto ako je neko blokiran imas novu šansu
Hello testers!
As you (hopefully) know, if you receive a certain number of rejections within a 30 day period, your account will be automatically blocked. This information can be found in our wiki linked below.
Blocking Policy · rainforestapp/tester-chrome-extension Wiki · GitHub
Previously, the limit was 20 rejections within 30 days. However, after further consideration with our science team on what this number should be, Rainforest has changed this limit from 20 rejections to 50 rejections within a 30 day period.
Why are we making this change?
After we released the new rule-based challenge questions, we discovered that many testers were unaware of the tester rules. As a result, a significant amount of testers have been automatically blocked for receiving 20 rejections within 30 days. While we need to address this greater issue of tester-education and training, we also need an immediate solution that will prevent more of our testing crowd from dwindling away as a result of these questions.
In the short term, we will increase the rejection limit to offer you a buffer period to get used to the questions appearing in your jobs and start answering them correctly.
In the long term, we will work on improving tester training and rule-education so you all can deliver better, more consistent results to our customers with more confidence and less anxiety than you currently have.
What now?
Some testers who were blocked for failing step-challenge questions under the 20 rejection limit will be unblocked (depending on the quality of their overall past performance) and given a chance to refresh themselves on our rules. If their account ends up being blocked again for the same reason, the decision will not be reversed.
Note:
- Both the rules and the 20-rejection limit have been publicly available for you to read at all times.
- The rules are things that you, as testers, are contractually obliged to read, know, and stay up to date on.
What can you do to help the situation?
You all are already so helpful, as we constantly witness in the forum! However, the best thing you can do is take the “teach a (wo)man to fish” approach. If you see that a fellow tester in the forum has a lot of questions about the rules, or you know your friend is receiving a lot of rejections, encourage them to check out our rules for themselves instead of handing them the answer. This will hopefully empower them to retain and understand the rules themselves as opposed to relying on other people for answers. The rules can be found in our support wiki, which can be accessed via the “Tester Community” tab of your portal profile. You can also find them linked below.
Guide Rules & Tester Role · rainforestapp/tester-chrome-extension Wiki · GitHub
If you have any questions or concerns about this update, please let us know in the forum or via “Get Help” using the category “Other.” Thank you for everything you all do, and happy testing

U isto vreme izbacismo post
Aj valjda ce neko imati srece da ga odblokiraju.

Hvala vudario i master Nole76, za post.

vudario, ubacujem u Nove onformacije, hvala.
(Necu prevoditi tamo, samo delic, a ovde neka pitaju za dodatne predloge i pomoc.)


P.S.
I dalje je prethodno saopstenje kod mene klasifikovano u fajl rapid-fire nonsense.
Nikada nisam naisla na firmu koja uradi sta god i nema pojma! o tome sta ce to da izazove. Svaki put uspeju da me sokiraju.
Kod nas se to zove - ne videti dalje od nosa. Ne znam za ostale nase drzave, koji je izraz.