Fri Apr 29, 2016 09:23 in General Talk
Don't you mean the Trashional Enguiirer? They are no better than any other trashy rumor rag. I don't get why people even bothering reading that stuff. They lie so much in these stories that the celebs are starting to say "ENOUGH" and suing them for their lies. The attorney for that rag bragged that most people are warned against taking them on because they would lose all their money. But some are still brave enough to do it.
If they were true stories, how come they get sued and the plaintiff wins? Carol Burnett, Elizabeth Taylor, David Katz regarding the Enquirer calling Phillip Seymour Hoffman a homosexual and being Hoffman's lover which was published AFTER Hoffman died. Why would they have waited? Because they didn't want to be sued by him....but Katz sued them and WON. These were ALL malicious stories that had NO iota of truth in them.
the story that "Casey Anthony Says Meter Reader Killed Caylee."? The story repeated several claims, attributed to Casey Anthony's legal team, about Kronk's past, including that he had displayed "inappropriate behavior with young girls" and had used duct tape to hold his ex-wife against her will. The suit dismisses the paper's claims as "false and defamatory," and says that it has caused Kronk to suffer "loss of reputation, embarrassment, humiliation [and] outrage," which destroyed this man's reputation.
Or how about Brooke Shields who bashed the tabloid for allegedly sending freelance reporters to check her dementia-addled mother out of her temporary assisted living facility. Or Farrah Fawcett, who called the magazine as "invasive and malignant as cancer" because of the story they wrote headlined "Ailing Farrah 'Wants to Die.'" Then there's Kirstie Alley whose career was damaged, Kate Hudson who sued AND WON after the tabloid published pictures of her under the headline suggesting, according to Hudson, that she was anorexic, or Ashley Olsen suggesting in the photo accompanying the story was "clearly designed to create the misimpression that she was 'drugged.'" Olsen also took issue with the Enquirer linking her to her-then boyfriend Scott Sartiano, who at the time, was being investigated by the FBI for allegedly selling ecstasy and cocaine. (His case was dismissed by a federal court in Los Angeles in November 2005.) She sued for $40 million and did get a retraction and apology (don't know if she got any money),
Papers like that need to be stopped, but how? They claim censorship if stopped. So they go on and keep on spreading rumors and lies.