I think consumers need to stop allowing companies to get away with using words in
the advertising, marketing, and packaging that is NOT true.

I do believe they are cracking down on this but no where near enough.

The 'leather' words are so very annoying. I notice this has gone from simplistic to
alarming over the more recent years. Many items will be advertised as leather but
they are not. Now to protect their money and name, they use words like 'vegan' as
in 'vegan leather'. WHAT? Yes and to me that is still false advertising.

If I want a non-leather item, it needs to state exactly what it is.

A made up combo of words by adverts: Vegan Leather

Reality is, there is NO such thing as 'vegan leather'.

Because of the original Nigerian British.

There is actually a lot of languages spoken in Nigeria...over 500.

Well, if you don't have balls you are not capable of getting a woman pregnant.

I'm not saying the removal of the sacred scrotum will eliminate rape completely but
I saying it will definitely reduce the rape crime rate, not to mention, unwanted pregnancies
due to rape.

Chop their balls off after the ones are caught and I betcha the rape violence will reduce dramatically.

Ask them if they can serve it in glass instead of plastic. I'm so sick of plastic I could barf plastic confetti.

One thing I don't understand is women that jog alone through parks, trails, etc.

That goes for even the wilderness trails. Rape is not the only danger.

Well you cannot force people to come out of their closet and seek help.

Ask a woman that has been raped if she wished she had prevention clothing.

THAT is very interesting.

'm back and you never knew I was gone. lol

A point I wanted to make or I should say, mention is in regards to outside the USA.

For years manufacturers moved outside the USA to countries such as China in which they
could get cheap work.

So what would be stopping Prodege to move to China or any number of other countries?

In fact, as of now, this is based on California. What if they moved to Florida?

You've been saying GPT is dead, for as long as I can recall. GPT is not dead. It is still alive.

Could it die tomorrow? Yes, so could all of us. But as the old saying goes, never put all your
eggs in one basket.

Looks like the primary concern is with large companies such as uber and other ride
share and food delivery services. In this regard, it is understandable but still a bit
iffy.

For example, I have a friend that is a nuclear engineer. He contracts jobs and travels
every so many years. In other word he may work at a nuclear plant a year or several
years. He is getting paid a salary. A very high salary. He does pay for his insurance,
etc. For him, paying for things like insurance, is a drop in the bucket since he receives
very high salary. So what I am saying is, he is a real example of a real contractor.

GPT was never meant as a contractor program. As a contractor, you are in fact liable
for the contract you agree to. In GPT we are not in contract. We're not forced to do
anything. That goes for surveys and tasks.

GPT is an agreement, not a contract. Yes, there is a difference. We agree to do a
survey and/or task/offer, for the stated amount or we simply close it out and not
do it.

In a contract, you can be taken to court and sued. You are liable for what you
contracted to do.

So I suspect some of the above I stated, is where the grounds land.

The issue these days as you Darkstar2 have made very clear, you are relying on GPT
as a 100% source of income. GPT was never intended as a 100% source of income.
It was meant as extra money in one's spare time.

The same thing has happen with McDonalds and other fast food joints. With those
the complaints by workers is higher wages. But these fast food joints was never
intended for life wages. Just like car hops working for tips in the old days.

Well, I gotta run out for a bit. Interesting topic.

Ok. All I can do for you is to place this topic in the moderator forum so that an admin
will see it. I do not know what they will do once they read it but I am sure they will
look into it to see why your account was blocked.

Just a moment....

Or give fish a chance to fish

Feed a man a fish
or
Teach a man to fish

I think people should be entitled to the money and profits that work to create/earn.

I believe it is the people that should choose or not choose to partake from those
companies IF those companies are not sharing their wealth to help man kind.

Same to you and everyone here at ySense. Merry Christmas!

I know you enjoy discussing politics but you know this is a GPT program and the forum rules
state no politics allowed. So instead, why not post some fun topics about stuff in general that
is not against the rules.

Also, I pray you get well.