Please wait...
HomeForumPosts by valerie

Jump to
Members LoungeYour StatsSuccess StoriesPayment ProofsMember IntroductionGeneral TalkForo en EspañolCharla GeneralSoporte General y PagosInternationalPortugueseItalianFrenchGermanHindiUrduFilipinoIndonesianArabicRomanianTurkishRussianBulgarianHungarianPolishEx-Yugoslavia
Posts by valerie

New Movies » Post #11

Sun Apr 09, 2017 05:20 in General Talk

Yeah, 'Black Mirror' is a series but not a soap opera. Every episode is individual with a
totally different story and different actors. For example 'Twilight Zone'.

New Movies » Post #5

Sat Apr 08, 2017 19:40 in General Talk

The one I watched tonight is 'Life'. Sci-Fi-Fy flick.i

WIN CLIXGRID.... :D » Post #16

Sat Apr 08, 2017 14:57 in Success Stories

all caps not allowed

New Movies » Post #3

Sat Apr 08, 2017 13:51 in General Talk

If it's a new movie just out with Tom Cruise, no have not seen it. I'll have to look that one up.
May be a trailer on youtube.

healthy world » Post #30

Sat Apr 08, 2017 13:49 in General Talk

dutch1898 wrote: Because of improved matters of communication we now hear much
more about diseases then even only 100 years ago. I consider
myself lucky that the availability of fresh fruits and vegetables
can reach the store shelves so much faster due to today's transportations.
Give it a few more years and SKYWAY will improve that a thousand fold.

That is extremely true and a point I made in regards to living in areas in which only certain crops grow
if any at all. People relied on what they had.

I always envy those people that live in tropical areas that have a large variety of fruits year round.

New Movies » Post #1

Sat Apr 08, 2017 13:01 in General Talk

Kong Island of the Skulls

I really liked that movie, watched it last night. Not an amazing movie, just a fun adventurous movie
set at the end of the Nam war era. Yep, a 'King Kong' sequel, you could say.

Chinese Man marriage Robot Girlfriend » Post #8

Sat Apr 08, 2017 12:43 in General Talk

If he gets mad at her, he could put her in the shower.

I am New of this PTC site. » Post #2

Sat Apr 08, 2017 12:41 in Your Stats

This is the STATS sub forum. You have not posted any Stats.

this is weird .. » Post #3

Sat Apr 08, 2017 10:57 in General Talk

I like ads. I've always liked them. Even as a kid I liked them.

Ads make the world go round.

I don't like an over abundant amount of ads and I think that has gotten to be an issue online
as well as offline.

I think that has been one big downfall in the USA in regards to television. They use to show
one commercial that lasted at the most 30 to 60 seconds and then back to the 30 minute
program and then maybe one more towards the end.

Now they want to show ten commercials that last longer than the program. That is a big
part of the reason tv is losing it's subscribers.

Chinese Man marriage Robot Girlfriend » Post #3

Sat Apr 08, 2017 08:03 in General Talk

Oh geesh, who would want that. He will be divorced in no time.

healthy world » Post #26

Sat Apr 08, 2017 07:58 in General Talk

Cancer has always been with humans. Always.

There are some forms of cancer that may be more prevalent today that a long time ago.

There is little record of health conditions from hundreds to thousands of years ago.

It is very well known and documented that people in some parts of the world appear to be more
susceptible to some forms of cancer vs another. Even better documented is the facts that people
in some parts of the world are less susceptible to cancer vs another part of the world.

According to what little they have found and studied, such as mummies, people even in Egyptian
times were known to have cancer.

Anything 'un natural' that we do to ourselves and/or put into our bodies, could trigger cancer.

As people age, they become weaker and more susceptible to disease. Unfortunate for people
of yesteryear, they did not live as long as we do today. Therefore it is impossible to say what
cancers they may have become afflicted with since they did not live long enough.

There is no way that you or anyone can prove that cancer is more prevalent today than years

I worked in health care all my life. I have seen many people with various forms of cancer and
no 'modernization' proof of their cancer.

healthy world » Post #22

Sat Apr 08, 2017 06:46 in General Talk

That's not true.

healthy world » Post #15

Fri Apr 07, 2017 14:31 in General Talk

My oldest daughter had breast cancer at a very early age, early 20's.

She had a mastectomy at Vanderbilt hospital in Nashville, Tennessee.

Since she was so young, they wanted to study/research her, so to speak.

What they discovered was she had two recessive genes on a particular strand. I don't recall
all the terminology. They said was common for people to have one recessive gene on that
strand but far less common to have two. She received one of the recessive genes from her
father and one from her mother, me. There was a lot more but this was a major thing they
looked at as a potential.

So now ask me the question. If I could have obliterated that recessive gene from my dna,
would I have done it? My answer would of course be YES.

It's always easy for someone not in the pool of things to say nay but when it hits home, the
answer often changes to yay.

healthy world » Post #11

Fri Apr 07, 2017 12:05 in General Talk

Actually, it's mostly about genetics and mutations along with the human susceptibility to any particular

You and I could live in the exact same environment, today or any time in history. We could eat the
same foods, live in the same house, do everything exactly the same. One of us might get lung cancer
and the other not, even though neither of us ever smoked and was never exposed to smoke.

Frankenstein, was more on target. :lol:

In other words, Science has focused on curing and obliterating disease and they have did a good
job of it in some aspects. However, they have not focused, until recently, the study of genetics
and DNA susceptibility along with the inability to change mutations on the strands.

Now that we know most of what happens to us (disease wise) is based on our DNA and susceptibility,
we have to discover how we can change our own DNA.

THAT is exactly where the CONFLICT comes in.

healthy world » Post #9

Fri Apr 07, 2017 09:45 in General Talk

rajukurup wrote:
valerie wrote: Not true.

All that you mentioned has always existed. Cancer, Diabetes, etc. It's always existed.

it is true that these diseases existed I meant that the number was comparatively less than that of today .in old times these diseases were rare but now these diseases are spreading like fire if we take a particular family any where in the world at least one would have it which is an impact of modernization

No they were not rare. They were very rampant.

In addition, much research has been done in cancer and many lives have been saved today
due to new research and meds.

It has also been stated and many researchers agree, that cancer is mostly hereditary.

healthy world » Post #6

Fri Apr 07, 2017 08:29 in General Talk

Not true.

All that you mentioned has always existed. Cancer, Diabetes, etc. It's always existed.

healthy world » Post #4

Fri Apr 07, 2017 06:54 in General Talk

Yeah, people are healthier today and they do live longer in general then in years past.

They did not have Trade way back then. Even when Trade started by ships, much of the food was rotten
or tainted by rats by the time it got where it was going.

Using the States as an example, Florida may have fruits such as oranges but New York did not have oranges.
So before there was Trade or Shipments of any kind, people were destined to eat only what they could harvest
in their area.

I believe this is also why 'meat' became a large source of food. If you lived in cold climates about the
only source of food you had was 'meat' and/or 'fish'.

People did not have a balance of vitamins and nutritions to prevent or fight off diseases and sickness.

Of course, medicine/doctors were not about much back in the dark ages, either.


Fri Apr 07, 2017 04:59 in General Talk

all caps is not allowed

Today 361.90 dollars , wow ....tasman1 » Post #2

Thu Apr 06, 2017 21:11 in General Talk

Eat a bunch

I do not understand....tasman1 » Post #3

Thu Apr 06, 2017 16:51 in General Talk

Yeah, it is insane.

For example a sugary drink may cost $1.00 and a sugar free drink may cost $1.00.

One would think if they take the sugar out, it would be $0.75.

Where they really get people is single people.

A single person might want an 8 oz can of beans instead of a 16 oz can of beans.

Often the 8 oz can will cost as much or more as the 16 oz.

16 oz = $1.00
8 oz = $1.02

From: Go
Return to the forums index
All times displayed are EST - Server Time: Mar 2, 2021 20:32:19 EST