Please wait...
HomeForumMembers LoungeGeneral TalkNuclear Arms Spending Priorities
Topic Rating:

Jump to
Members LoungeYour StatsSuccess StoriesPayment ProofsMember IntroductionGeneral TalkForo en EspañolCharla GeneralSoporte General y PagosInternationalPortugueseItalianFrenchGermanHindiUrduFilipinoIndonesianArabicRomanianTurkishRussianBulgarianHungarianPolishEx-Yugoslavia
Nuclear Arms Spending Priorities

Locked

#1 by josealvesjr » Mon Jun 15, 2020 08:46

Not only the USA and Russia are modernising their nuclear arsenals but also India and China have increased their nuclear arsenal over the last year, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). The Swedish think-tank that researches on conflict, armaments and arms control also pointed out on Monday that China is significantly modernising its nuclear arsenal.

Thank God they all have their priorities in order. It is just the time to do so.
josealvesjr
Posts1,497
Member Since15 Sep 2011
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given341
Likes Received1,115/717

#2 by Arvind9 » Mon Jun 15, 2020 09:02

Thats right it reduces the chances of a war,only a limited war is possible,we had a war with Pakistan several times in the past but since both India and Pakistan developed Nuclear weapons the chances of a war are nil,both contries only indulge in a limited war that is firing at each other at the border sending a military into each other's territory has become impossible,Pakistan's nuclear weapons are not too mordern but enough to serve the purpose,war is just a word politicians use to take advantage of peoples sentiments,hope countries could spend more on nuclear energy which would help in developing clean energy
Last edited by Arvind9 » Mon Jun 15, 2020 09:10 » edited 1 time in total
Arvind9
Posts3,801
Member Since16 Jun 2013
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given2,948
Likes Received2,170/1,589

#3 by wildbillhickok » Mon Jun 15, 2020 11:36

I see the nuclear weaponry as a mean to dissuade, avoiding a war.

Imagine if only pakistan or only India had Nuclear capabilities. On my view an armistice would not be viable anymore. If forces were unbalanced the stronger side would impose its rules over the weaker. There is mutual respect there.


The greatest Nuclear potencies fear, and thus select who they want to have and not have Nukes.
Look how much US, Israel and the international community fear Iran's national nuclear program. Iran faces sanctions since almost "forever". All this to keep Iran from attaining the capacilibty to enrich Uranium at a certain level, and to become a greater threat to interests in the region.



Also, no country can maintain the integrity of its borders, defend their interests, without the capability of defend himself.
wildbillhickok
Posts253
Member Since23 Sep 2017
Last Visit17 Feb 2021
Likes Given124
Likes Received147/116

#4 by Arvind9 » Mon Jun 15, 2020 11:50

Thats right Pakistan is economically very weak but we still cannot get into a war with Pakistan,,getting into a war with Pakistan will only create a situation where Pakistan is more likely to use its nuclear weapons against us because they would feel venerable in a war because we are far more advanced,so we are restricted to exchange of fire at the border,China thinks more intelligently they will keep testing India's power and take advantage wherever they find weakness against us but even they would never get into a nuclear war
Arvind9
Posts3,801
Member Since16 Jun 2013
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given2,948
Likes Received2,170/1,589

#5 by josealvesjr » Mon Jun 15, 2020 11:59

Arvind9 wrote: Thats right Pakistan is economically very weak but we still cannot get into a war with Pakistan,,getting into a war with Pakistan will only create a situation where Pakistan is more likely to use its nuclear weapons against us because they would feel venerable in a war because we are far more advanced,so we are restricted to exchange of fire at the border,China thinks more intelligently they will keep testing India's power and take advantage wherever they find weakness against us but even they would never get into a nuclear war[/quote

Deleted
Last edited by josealvesjr » Mon Jun 15, 2020 12:10 » edited 2 times in total
josealvesjr
Posts1,497
Member Since15 Sep 2011
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given341
Likes Received1,115/717

#6 by Arvind9 » Mon Jun 15, 2020 12:16

No its not entirely Kashmir,partition in 1947 is still a very lively issue,just imagine that almost no one can really relate how the partition happened even our present Prime minister was not born at that time,but he can talk as if he saw everything,the point is after a certain time history can be distorted because no one living now saw it,those who saw it can only tell you about their experience during partation the rest are blank,so again Pakistan becomes an issue,its very common in many countries governments keep changing history to make it more politically viable
Last edited by Arvind9 » Mon Jun 15, 2020 12:24 » edited 1 time in total
Arvind9
Posts3,801
Member Since16 Jun 2013
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given2,948
Likes Received2,170/1,589

#7 by glevinp » Tue Jun 16, 2020 09:19

China kills one Indian officer and two soldiers
India slaughters 5 Chinese soldiers in bloody massacre- border tensions erupt
glevinp
Posts246
Member Since19 Jul 2019
Last Visit11 Apr 2021
Likes Given12
Likes Received191/126

#8 by josealvesjr » Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:23

Latest from BBC (16 min.ago). Is this going to escalate????

At least 20 Indian soldiers were killed in a clash with Chinese forces in Ladakh in the disputed Kashmir region, Indian officials say.

The incident follows rising tensions, and is the first deadly clash in the border area in at least 45 years.
josealvesjr
Posts1,497
Member Since15 Sep 2011
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given341
Likes Received1,115/717

#9 by Arvind9 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 10:48

China had bulit a road from China to Ladakh which is in Pakistan administered Kashmir they get direct access to the border with India,indirectly China is fighting an limited war for Pakistan without involving Pakistan in it ,China has always supported Pakistan in UN on the Kashmir issue and they make sure the Kashmir dispute never reaches a solution because it benefits both Pakistan and China,Since China has veto powers in the UN it keeps vetoing against India's stand on Kashmir while Pakistan does not have much to do,Donald Trump keeps saying he can help but the Indian government keeps refusing because the day the US intervenes there will be a UN monitored plebiscite and Kashmiris will vote for an Independent country it will suit Pakistan because it will be an Islamic country,75% Kashmiris are muslims they will decide Kashmiris fate its a very difficult situation
Last edited by Arvind9 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 11:26 » edited 2 times in total
Arvind9
Posts3,801
Member Since16 Jun 2013
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given2,948
Likes Received2,170/1,589

#10 by valerie » Tue Jun 16, 2020 14:00

I think China's goal is to take over the world, road by road.
valerie
Posts21,006
Member Since27 Feb 2007
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given5,158
Likes Received19,088/7,896

#11 by tasman1 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 15:35

India - China Clash

Question , like in any clash in the world there are third side that support clash and put oil in fire ?

In short and open talk ............ How and who will support India -China clash to escalate ?

World know but world never talk


B.T.W . Do you know that Hitler did not declare war on England , or France or rest ? England , France and rest declared war on Germany

Same situation is now , India and China do not wish to have war but dying empire like America must have war

Current and dying empire list

U.S.A,........... and ally
Russia ...........and ally
Last edited by tasman1 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 15:44 » edited 1 time in total
tasman1
Posts14,612
Member Since5 May 2012
Last VisitToday
Likes Given13,067
Likes Received14,656/7,562

#12 by horkos » Tue Jun 16, 2020 15:43

tasman1 wrote: India - China Clash

Question , like in any clash in the world there are third side that support clash and put oil in fire ?

In short and open talk ............ How and who will support India -China clash to escalate ?

World know but world never talk


B.T.W . Do you know that Hitler did not declare war on England , or France or rest ? England , France and rest declared war on Germany

Same situation is now , India and China do not wish to have war but dying empire like America must have war

Hitler declared war on Poland on September 1, 1939 - the first country that did not succumb to annexation. England and France declared war on Germany as an alliance commitment to Poland.
horkos
Posts831
Member Since4 Sep 2016
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given165
Likes Received173/123

#13 by tasman1 » Tue Jun 16, 2020 16:16

horkos wrote:
tasman1 wrote: India - China Clash

Question , like in any clash in the world there are third side that support clash and put oil in fire ?

In short and open talk ............ How and who will support India -China clash to escalate ?

World know but world never talk


B.T.W . Do you know that Hitler did not declare war on England , or France or rest ? England , France and rest declared war on Germany

Same situation is now , India and China do not wish to have war but dying empire like America must have war

Hitler declared war on Poland on September 1, 1939 - the first country that did not succumb to annexation. England and France declared war on Germany as an alliance commitment to Poland.





Or ........ England and France lost empire and world wide dominance ?????????????????? like America and Russia are loosing it now ??????

Do you realy think England and France liked Poland that much ????
tasman1
Posts14,612
Member Since5 May 2012
Last VisitToday
Likes Given13,067
Likes Received14,656/7,562
Return to 'General Talk' Forum     Return to the forums index
All times displayed are EST - Server Time: Apr 19, 2021 00:16:11 EST