Please wait...
HomeForumInternationalEx-YugoslaviaRainforest Task
Topic Rating:

Jump to
Members LoungeYour StatsSuccess StoriesPayment ProofsMember IntroductionGeneral TalkForo en EspañolCharla GeneralSoporte General y PagosInternationalPortugueseItalianFrenchGermanNederlandsGreekHindiUrduBengaliFilipinoIndonesianMalayArabicRomanianTurkishRussianBulgarianHungarianPolishEx-Yugoslavia
Rainforest Task

#5541 by darthjovan » Fri Aug 03, 2018 17:57

Rainforest pusta ko lud taskove. Jedan za drugim idu, ne moze u wc da se ode.
darthjovan
Posts455
Member Since25 Feb 2015
Last Visit22 Sep 2019
Likes Given293
Likes Received917/333

#5542 by eufrat » Fri Aug 03, 2018 18:43

zato sto vecina radi wikipedija zadatke :mrgreen:
eufrat
Posts624
Member Since23 Jun 2015
Last Visit12 Oct 2019
Likes Given1,210
Likes Received1,718/613

#5543 by EddieGunner » Tue Sep 04, 2018 16:01

jeli neko imao problem sa RF kad dobije notifikaciju da ima WORK klikne na istu i ne otvori novi tab sa taskom ?? evo nocas mi se to desava non stop. Nisam bio aktivan zadnjih mesec-dva pa reko da nisu bile neke drasticne promjene.
EddieGunner
Posts388
Member Since27 Mar 2015
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given190
Likes Received295/137

#5544 by Nole76 » Mon Sep 10, 2018 17:20

Updates to Step-Challenge Questions 2018-09-10 20:32:57, Kristen Hohenstein
Hello, everyone!
We’ve made some changes to the paid challenge question you are asked to answer during every job. You should expect to see this change reflected sometime later this week, possibly as early as today. Please read on for more details.
*How It Currently Is*
At the end of every Rainforest job, you are currently asked to answer a randomly generated Yes/No question. These questions exist to confirm that you are reading the instructions & are a human (not a robot). The question usually comes in the format of “Add 588 and 161 using a calculator. Is the sum 745?” or “Look at the computer. Are you a human?”
*How It Will Be (Later This Week)*
The current set of challenge questions described above will be removed and replaced with questions related to our testing rules. The format will remain the same — simple Yes/No questions that you can answer in a very short period of time.
The purpose of these challenge questions is still to confirm the criteria mentioned above, but now with the added benefit of reiterating simple, important aspects of our testing rules in order to maintain a high level of results quality for our clients. An example of how these questions will be formatted is “Recall Rule 2 about quotes & placeholders. Should you take capitalization differences into consideration when quotes are used in the instructions?”
It’s important to note that these questions were not phrased to be tricky. They are intended to be simple and straightforward, and you should be able to answer them easily if you have a good grasp of our testing rules. That being said, there is a penalty for getting them wrong just like before: we will reject the work. So make sure you read them carefully and don’t rush to an answer.
We will be adding additional questions to the rotation when we publish updates to our testing rules in upcoming weeks. The questions you’ll see published this week do not include future rule updates.
We hope this is a meaningful step toward a more holistic rule-education process at Rainforest QA. If you have feedback, please let us know what you think on the official forum thread or via the “Get Help” page of your portal profile using the “Other” category. We look forward to hearing from you.
Keep your eyes peeled for other updates from us in this realm, such as improvements to tool tips & the testing interface! Happy Testing ❤️

Bice ovde gomila problema :D
Nole76
Posts2,082
Member Since27 Aug 2015
Last Visit19 Oct 2019
Likes Given9,437
Likes Received4,810/1,727

#5545 by Garagos » Mon Sep 10, 2018 19:10

Zanimljiv update.

Moze li neko ko bude dobio ta pitanja, da ih postavi ovde i napise tacne odgovore ? Za nas koji ne citamo uputstva bas uvek ... :D :D
Garagos
Posts1,318
Member Since21 Aug 2015
Last Visit2 Oct 2019
Likes Given2,061
Likes Received3,271/1,210

#5546 by incomehomejob » Tue Sep 11, 2018 05:30

Garagos wrote: ... Za nas koji ne citamo uputstva bas uvek ... :D :D

:lol: :lol: :lol:

Nisi ti dzabe miljenik foruma, nasmeja me naglas. :D
Samo udri sa pitanjima, objasnicemo sve sto umemo, samo ce u ovom slucaju to izgleda biti malo teze, obzirom na koncept saopstenja.
(P.S. Nevezano od ovoga - citaj Instrukcije da ti ne bih pretila opet da cu da te ugazim. :D )


Nole76 wrote: Updates to Step-Challenge Questions 2018-09-10 20:32:57, Kristen Hohenstein
Hello, everyone!
We’ve made some changes to the paid challenge question you are asked to answer during every job. You should expect to see this change reflected sometime later this week, possibly as early as today. Please read on for more details.
*How It Currently Is*
At the end of every Rainforest job, you are currently asked to answer a randomly generated Yes/No question. These questions exist to confirm that you are reading the instructions & are a human (not a robot). The question usually comes in the format of “Add 588 and 161 using a calculator. Is the sum 745?” or “Look at the computer. Are you a human?”
*How It Will Be (Later This Week)*
The current set of challenge questions described above will be removed and replaced with questions related to our testing rules. The format will remain the same — simple Yes/No questions that you can answer in a very short period of time.
The purpose of these challenge questions is still to confirm the criteria mentioned above, but now with the added benefit of reiterating simple, important aspects of our testing rules in order to maintain a high level of results quality for our clients. An example of how these questions will be formatted is “Recall Rule 2 about quotes & placeholders. Should you take capitalization differences into consideration when quotes are used in the instructions?”
It’s important to note that these questions were not phrased to be tricky. They are intended to be simple and straightforward, and you should be able to answer them easily if you have a good grasp of our testing rules. That being said, there is a penalty for getting them wrong just like before: we will reject the work. So make sure you read them carefully and don’t rush to an answer.
We will be adding additional questions to the rotation when we publish updates to our testing rules in upcoming weeks. The questions you’ll see published this week do not include future rule updates.
We hope this is a meaningful step toward a more holistic rule-education process at Rainforest QA. If you have feedback, please let us know what you think on the official forum thread or via the “Get Help” page of your portal profile using the “Other” category. We look forward to hearing from you.
Keep your eyes peeled for other updates from us in this realm, such as improvements to tool tips & the testing interface! Happy Testing ❤️

Bice ovde gomila problema :D

Hvala za info master Nole76, ubacila u Nove informacije temu.

Vezano za Highlight tvog posta - nisam tamo u temi (Nove informacije) znala ni odakle da pocnem sa skracenim prevodom. :D

"We will be adding additional questions to the rotation when we publish updates to our testing rules in upcoming weeks. The questions you’ll see published this week do not include future rule updates." :lol:
Dakle, vracamo se na 'momenat' gde ce nam pregledati uradjeno unazad, a 'pregledaci' ili nece imati pojma da li smo tacno odgovorili po Pravilima koja su bila na snazi u ko zna kom periodu, ili cemo naleteti na nekog tupavog 'pregledaca' koga je bas briga da na to obrati paznju. (Ova druga opcija je vezana za ideju da ce neko i da se seti da bi trebalo da se oznaci time-frame u odnosu na priznavanje/ne-priznavanje Testnih Pitanja.)

Celo objasnjenje ide cik-cak iz jedne krajnosti u drugu. I kako mi da znamo koji 'smer' da odaberemo: cik ili cak. :roll: :D

Ovo moze da se klasifikuje u fajl pod nazivom rapid-fire nonsense. :D
Koju god tacku da uzmes kao referentnu u tekstu, cik je povezi sa ma kojom drugom. :D
incomehomejob
Posts6,874
Member Since24 Jan 2015
Last Visit10 Oct 2019
Likes Given31,887
Likes Received12,126/4,907

#5547 by eufrat » Tue Sep 11, 2018 13:55

vrhunac RF-a. :mrgreen: :lol:

hahahahahaha :D
eufrat
Posts624
Member Since23 Jun 2015
Last Visit12 Oct 2019
Likes Given1,210
Likes Received1,718/613

#5548 by pupijevi » Tue Sep 11, 2018 15:59

Bice ovde dosta posla za pocetak.

A ovaj mi nikako ne ide sta je tacan odgovor.

Are you encouraged to use the SI feature if the step instructions could be broken into multiple steps?

A pogledajte u pravilniku:

If there are multiple questions asked and ALL of them are true, answer Yes, but click ‘Suggest Improvement’, select This step can be broken into multiple steps and leave a comment explaining to the user that it’s better to have one question per step. Be sure to be polite and courteous.

Ovo je i cista "igra" reci ali ajd sad znaj sta je tacan odgovor. Pravilnik kaze: "If there are multiple questions asked and ALL of them are true, answer Yes..." a gore pita: "Are you encouraged..." :?

Kakvo je vase iskustvo?
pupijevi
Posts3,372
Member Since8 Feb 2015
Last VisitYesterday
Likes Given1,650
Likes Received8,513/2,649

#5549 by eufrat » Tue Sep 11, 2018 16:33

tacan odgovor je job abandoned :mrgreen:


ako nisi siguran u svoj odgovor, napusti test. To je bolje resenje nego blokada. Ovo je najverovatnije ''izgovor'' da sto vise ljudi blokiraju, isto su uradili prosle godine u ovo vreme (ako se secate, RF forum septembar i oktobar prosle godine, svakog dana gomila ljudi blokirana, i to u periodu kada su testirali rad novih ''pregledaca'').

Ne radi se o igri reci vec o tome sto RF konstatno menja pravila, i kad ih ne menja, u zavisnosti od situacije, za jedno pravilo vazi i vise pravila. Na takav jedan neozbiljan nacin se ne moze unaprediti kvalitet rada testera, kao ni poboljsati krajnji rezultati za klijenta.
Last edited by eufrat » Tue Sep 11, 2018 17:00 » edited 2 times in total
eufrat
Posts624
Member Since23 Jun 2015
Last Visit12 Oct 2019
Likes Given1,210
Likes Received1,718/613

#5550 by Nole76 » Wed Sep 12, 2018 11:54

pupijevi wrote:
A ovaj mi nikako ne ide sta je tacan odgovor.

Are you encouraged to use the SI feature if the step instructions could be broken into multiple steps?

YES i teraj dalje :D
Nole76
Posts2,082
Member Since27 Aug 2015
Last Visit19 Oct 2019
Likes Given9,437
Likes Received4,810/1,727

#5551 by Garagos » Wed Sep 12, 2018 16:59

Recall Rule 2 about quotes & placeholders.
Are test authors allowed to use __ placeholders within quoted text?


Aj sto ne volim matematiku, ali ova pitanja... Covece !
Garagos
Posts1,318
Member Since21 Aug 2015
Last Visit2 Oct 2019
Likes Given2,061
Likes Received3,271/1,210

#5552 by cikalibi » Thu Sep 13, 2018 13:00

Garagos wrote: Recall Rule 2 about quotes & placeholders.
Are test authors allowed to use __ placeholders within quoted text?


Aj sto ne volim matematiku, ali ova pitanja... Covece !

YES
cikalibi
Posts306
Member Since13 Feb 2016
Last Visit18 Aug 2019
Likes Given1,632
Likes Received701/257

#5553 by Garagos » Thu Sep 13, 2018 18:20

Hvala cikalibi !

Iskreno, ja stvarno ne znam odgovore na sva ta pitanja, procitam vise puta, pa kako mi se cini da bi trebalo, tako pritisnem yes ili no, nije bilo gresaka za sada...
Garagos
Posts1,318
Member Since21 Aug 2015
Last Visit2 Oct 2019
Likes Given2,061
Likes Received3,271/1,210

#5554 by edom2606 » Sat Sep 15, 2018 01:17

Upalim komp jutros, odem na RF profil, vidim BLOCKED vrišti sa ekrana. Razlog: You have failed to follow instructions on too many jobs. Ima li svrhe da se žalim?
edom2606
Posts39
Member Since1 Dec 2014
Last Visit20 Oct 2019
Likes Given17
Likes Received78/35

#5555 by incomehomejob » Sat Sep 15, 2018 08:24

Zao mi je. :(

Do sada, koliko ja znam, se pisalo na ovaj mejl:
tester@rainforestqa.com

E, sad, oni su vrlo 'poznati' po tome da ne odgovaraju ni na tikete ni na mejlove ni pribliznom brzinom kako to radi CS i F8.

Bilo je naloga koji su blokirani i posle odblokirani, nemoj to da te brine, postoji sansa. Ne znam sta je u pitanju i sta je razlog, tako da ne mogu da tvrdim sta ce da bude krajni rezultat.
U svakom slucaju, napisi im kao deo mejla i molibu da jos jednom pregledaju nalog i da zamolis za jos jednu sansu.
Moze da bude i neki sistemski bug.
Niko od nas ne zna sta se desava sa suprotne strane, nemamo nikakav uvid.

Ako treba pomoc za pisanje tiketa/mejla, javni. :)

P.S.
Molba za kolege za ispravku, ako je bolje pisati na neki drugi mejl, a ne na ovaj koji sam ja postovala ovde.
incomehomejob
Posts6,874
Member Since24 Jan 2015
Last Visit10 Oct 2019
Likes Given31,887
Likes Received12,126/4,907

#5556 by edom2606 » Sat Sep 15, 2018 13:27

Hvala na informaciji.
edom2606
Posts39
Member Since1 Dec 2014
Last Visit20 Oct 2019
Likes Given17
Likes Received78/35

#5557 by incomehomejob » Sat Sep 15, 2018 13:44

Nema na cemu. :)
Nadam se da ce bude sve ok sa nalogom. :)
incomehomejob
Posts6,874
Member Since24 Jan 2015
Last Visit10 Oct 2019
Likes Given31,887
Likes Received12,126/4,907

#5558 by vudario » Tue Sep 25, 2018 09:13

eto ako je neko blokiran imas novu šansu
Hello testers!
As you (hopefully) know, if you receive a certain number of rejections within a 30 day period, your account will be automatically blocked. This information can be found in our wiki linked below.
Blocking Policy · rainforestapp/tester-chrome-extension Wiki · GitHub
Previously, the limit was 20 rejections within 30 days. However, after further consideration with our science team on what this number should be, Rainforest has changed this limit from 20 rejections to 50 rejections within a 30 day period.
Why are we making this change?
After we released the new rule-based challenge questions, we discovered that many testers were unaware of the tester rules. As a result, a significant amount of testers have been automatically blocked for receiving 20 rejections within 30 days. While we need to address this greater issue of tester-education and training, we also need an immediate solution that will prevent more of our testing crowd from dwindling away as a result of these questions.
In the short term, we will increase the rejection limit to offer you a buffer period to get used to the questions appearing in your jobs and start answering them correctly.
In the long term, we will work on improving tester training and rule-education so you all can deliver better, more consistent results to our customers with more confidence and less anxiety than you currently have.
What now?
Some testers who were blocked for failing step-challenge questions under the 20 rejection limit will be unblocked (depending on the quality of their overall past performance) and given a chance to refresh themselves on our rules. If their account ends up being blocked again for the same reason, the decision will not be reversed.
Note:
- Both the rules and the 20-rejection limit have been publicly available for you to read at all times.
- The rules are things that you, as testers, are contractually obliged to read, know, and stay up to date on.
What can you do to help the situation?
You all are already so helpful, as we constantly witness in the forum! However, the best thing you can do is take the “teach a (wo)man to fish” approach. If you see that a fellow tester in the forum has a lot of questions about the rules, or you know your friend is receiving a lot of rejections, encourage them to check out our rules for themselves instead of handing them the answer. This will hopefully empower them to retain and understand the rules themselves as opposed to relying on other people for answers. The rules can be found in our support wiki, which can be accessed via the “Tester Community” tab of your portal profile. You can also find them linked below.
Guide Rules & Tester Role · rainforestapp/tester-chrome-extension Wiki · GitHub
If you have any questions or concerns about this update, please let us know in the forum or via “Get Help” using the category “Other.” Thank you for everything you all do, and happy testing
vudario
Posts120
Member Since14 Jul 2013
Last Visit3 Oct 2019
Likes Given386
Likes Received388/118

#5559 by Nole76 » Tue Sep 25, 2018 09:14

U isto vreme izbacismo post :D
Aj valjda ce neko imati srece da ga odblokiraju.
Last edited by Nole76 » Tue Sep 25, 2018 09:16 » edited 1 time in total
Nole76
Posts2,082
Member Since27 Aug 2015
Last Visit19 Oct 2019
Likes Given9,437
Likes Received4,810/1,727

#5560 by incomehomejob » Tue Sep 25, 2018 09:41

Hvala vudario i master Nole76, za post. :)

vudario, ubacujem u Nove onformacije, hvala. :)
(Necu prevoditi tamo, samo delic, a ovde neka pitaju za dodatne predloge i pomoc.)


P.S.
I dalje je prethodno saopstenje kod mene klasifikovano u fajl rapid-fire nonsense.
Nikada nisam naisla na firmu koja uradi sta god i nema pojma! o tome sta ce to da izazove. Svaki put uspeju da me sokiraju.
Kod nas se to zove - ne videti dalje od nosa. :D Ne znam za ostale nase drzave, koji je izraz. :)
incomehomejob
Posts6,874
Member Since24 Jan 2015
Last Visit10 Oct 2019
Likes Given31,887
Likes Received12,126/4,907
Return to 'Ex-Yugoslavia' Forum     Return to the forums index
All times displayed are EST - Server Time: Oct 22, 2019 00:06:32 EST