Please wait...
HomeForumInternationalEx-YugoslaviaRainforest Task
Topic Rating:

Jump to
Members LoungeYour StatsSuccess StoriesPayment ProofsMember IntroductionGeneral TalkForo en EspañolCharla GeneralSoporte General y PagosInternationalPortugueseItalianFrenchGermanNederlandsGreekHindiUrduBengaliFilipinoIndonesianMalayArabicRomanianTurkishRussianBulgarianHungarianPolishEx-Yugoslavia
Rainforest Task

#3941 by pupijevi » Tue Dec 13, 2016 09:41

Kod mene dva kodinga za pocetak dana ukupno 40+ stepova,inace ni jedan do kraja ali sasvim ok.

Samo nek nastave danas tako necu da se zalim :D
pupijevi
Posts3,372
Member Since8 Feb 2015
Last VisitToday
Likes Given1,650
Likes Received8,513/2,649

#3942 by bakeer1337 » Tue Dec 13, 2016 09:45

Odlican pocetak dana nakon dugo vremena, već 15 komada odrađenih od toga 7-8 kodinga te već nekih 10$ od rf-a :clap:
bakeer1337
Posts197
Member Since23 Feb 2016
Last Visit10 Mar 2018
Likes Given191
Likes Received441/169

#3943 by midhat1986 » Tue Dec 13, 2016 10:12

koding ide ko lud a nakon dugo vermena da dobijem jedan od 98 koraka...mozda krene vise nabolje
midhat1986
Posts124
Member Since17 May 2016
Last Visit5 Jun 2018
Likes Given127
Likes Received267/119

#3944 by pupijevi » Tue Dec 13, 2016 10:57

Knjizara puta 2 oba server internal error....hvala bogu :D
pupijevi
Posts3,372
Member Since8 Feb 2015
Last VisitToday
Likes Given1,650
Likes Received8,513/2,649

#3945 by jeckamil » Tue Dec 13, 2016 11:05

Job Abandoned. Knjizara i simulator. Nema sanse da zapocnem zadatak. Doduse nije mi ni zao :D
jeckamil
Posts778
Member Since13 Feb 2015
Last Visit13 Oct 2019
Likes Given2,419
Likes Received1,898/673

#3946 by Berikai » Tue Dec 13, 2016 12:46

Nakon solidnog početka sada opet pustoš. Nikad na zelenu granu. :(
Berikai
Posts1,862
Member Since18 Jan 2015
Last VisitToday
Likes Given929
Likes Received3,767/1,554

#3947 by nesovan » Tue Dec 13, 2016 15:33

U sred rada mi ode u Abandoned od 30+ koraka :(
nesovan
Posts246
Member Since3 Feb 2016
Last Visit16 Jan 2019
Likes Given224
Likes Received612/232

#3948 by Nole76 » Tue Dec 13, 2016 19:42

Sad sam imao borbu sa kuhinjom. Radio sam 20 koraka preko 2o minuta. :roll:
Nole76
Posts2,082
Member Since27 Aug 2015
Last Visit14 Oct 2019
Likes Given9,437
Likes Received4,810/1,727

#3949 by pupijevi » Wed Dec 14, 2016 08:52

Pop-up rule change 2016-12-14 13:48:27 UTC, Kristen Hohenstein
Hello dear testers! We’re changing our rules regarding pop-ups.
In the past, we told you to report any pop-up a test author did not mention in the instructions, including pop-ups not produced from the customer website itself (e.g. pop-ups related to browser updates, network issues, browsers saving your password, etc).
We originally decided on this solution with the intention to disable all pop-ups not produced from a customer’s website itself. Unfortunately, this has been very hard to keep up. Every browser update presents new pop-ups we need to disable and we often don’t learn about them until after customer results have been affected. This results in testers being forced to fail an otherwise passable test due to a random popup the customer likely doesn’t care about. This is not useful for our customers, is incredibly frustrating for our testers, and not a good use of developer time.
Moving forward, you only need to report a pop-up if it is a pop-up produced by the customer’s website that the test author didn’t warn you about. Do NOT report pop-ups that are related to browsers, networks, hardware etc. Here are a couple examples of the distinction we’re drawing:
- If you log into a customer’s website and you get a pop up asking if you want Chrome to save your password, do NOT report this.
- If you are testing for Best Company Ever and encounter a pop-up asking, “Do you want to subscribe to weekly email updates from Best Company Ever?”, but the test author never mentioned encountering this pop-up in the instructions, you need to report it.
I hope this solution makes testing with Rainforest a better experience for both our testers and our customers. Do NOT stress about nitpicking over this in the future — discernment and common sense should hopefully be enough to determine whether a pop-up is directly produced by a customer’s website or by something else, like a browser setting or network update. If we see this solution isn’t working and there’s still a lot of confusion, we will readjust as needed. Moving forward, please only submit support tickets or create forum topics about this if it is a pop-up that’s truly confusing. I’ll be updating the forum and confusing scenarios wiki page with this information, and will also try to make tutorial videos with examples to supplement this announcement in the future. It's important to note that you still need to report error messages you receive. So if you encounter an error message in pop-up format, you need to report this.
I also want to emphasize a point that’s not a rule change, but something I’ve said before: If a test author instructs you at the beginning of the test to close any pop-ups you might encounter and continue testing, this counts as them mentioning any pop-up you might encounter. Do NOT report pop-ups you encounter after a test author says this.
Thank you for hanging in there with us and understanding that we’re always trying to improve our processes even if we don’t get it right the first time. We sincerely appreciate everything you do for us. Happy testing ❤
pupijevi
Posts3,372
Member Since8 Feb 2015
Last VisitToday
Likes Given1,650
Likes Received8,513/2,649

#3950 by trboye » Wed Dec 14, 2016 09:10

Dobio electricity od 45 stepova i poslali mi job disagriment.

Trebao sam u gmail inboxu da pretrazim mail po imenu i prezimenu i nije ga bilo.. ali ga vidim da je tu, samo sa email adresom za koju sam poslao invite.
I udarim YES i prodje sve lepo do kraja.

Sada sam objasnio da sam mail video i tako to... da li se ova moja glupost moze kasnije nesto kao negativno reflektovati u daljem radu? Oni kazu da ovo nije rejection, nego learning oportunity... :)
trboye
Posts199
Member Since27 Dec 2014
Last Visit2 Oct 2019
Likes Given203
Likes Received460/160

#3951 by pupijevi » Wed Dec 14, 2016 09:41

Ne trebas da brines.

Inace i sam dobijem JD gde sam u pravu dok ostala 2 kontributora recimo prijave da imaju error a sve je lepo na screenshotu pokazano da nemam nikakav problem ali eto mora da se dobije JD zbog te dvojice.

Zato lepo objasnis tamo o cemu se radi i nema problema. To jest trebali bi da uvaze ako je sve lepo dokazano i vidljivo kroz SS.
pupijevi
Posts3,372
Member Since8 Feb 2015
Last VisitToday
Likes Given1,650
Likes Received8,513/2,649

#3952 by jeckamil » Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:19

Da li vi mozete da vidite retrospektivu. Ja kad pokusam kaze da stranica ne postoji :?

jesam li propustila neko obavestenje u vezi toga ?
jeckamil
Posts778
Member Since13 Feb 2015
Last Visit13 Oct 2019
Likes Given2,419
Likes Received1,898/673

#3953 by Darkko365 » Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:34

"click through any / all links and buttons"

Šta radite kad u instrukcijama piše ovo? Šta misli ovaj koji je pravio ovaj test, da ću za 4 centa ceo sajt da mu proverim?
Darkko365
Posts87
Member Since12 Jan 2016
Last Visit8 Nov 2018
Likes Given6
Likes Received199/76

#3954 by true_hiker » Wed Dec 14, 2016 11:45

sinoć kuhinja 6 koraka, i danas još dva po sedam. Ostalo - ako bude šta i blizu toga, ide prijava na maksimalno drugom koraku. Jedva dolar kad se sabere
true_hiker
Posts871
Member Since27 Dec 2015
Last Visit24 Sep 2019
Likes Given94
Likes Received1,849/800

#3955 by pupijevi » Wed Dec 14, 2016 12:09

Darkko365 wrote: "click through any / all links and buttons"

Šta radite kad u instrukcijama piše ovo? Šta misli ovaj koji je pravio ovaj test, da ću za 4 centa ceo sajt da mu proverim?

Koliko ja tu vidim pitanje je da se klikne bilo koji ILI svaki link i dugme pretpostavljam do odredjenog cilja koji se trazi. Ako je ta / postavljena tu.


Inace i kod mene za razliku od juce jako slab dan tek 3 hita :?
pupijevi
Posts3,372
Member Since8 Feb 2015
Last VisitToday
Likes Given1,650
Likes Received8,513/2,649

#3956 by cebence » Wed Dec 14, 2016 12:11

svi ovi Safari mi odose u napuistene zbog toga sto nece da mi otvori pretrazivac :oops:
cebence
Posts61
Member Since16 Jan 2016
Last Visit6 Nov 2017
Likes Given127
Likes Received153/57

#3957 by Nole76 » Wed Dec 14, 2016 12:13

Retrospektiva je izgleda ukinuta.
Nole76
Posts2,082
Member Since27 Aug 2015
Last Visit14 Oct 2019
Likes Given9,437
Likes Received4,810/1,727

#3958 by bakeer1337 » Wed Dec 14, 2016 12:25

Nole76 wrote: Retrospektiva je izgleda ukinuta.

Da, bilo je price o tome na rf forumu, pocelo je zloupotrebljavanje opcije jer ispocetka uopste nisu zeljeli da se gleda retrospektiva svakog nego samo onih za koje dobijes "job disagreement". Zloupotreba je nastala tako da je svako ziv poceo prijavljivati na njihovom forumu gdje god ugleda da je neko napravio gresku te su se sami testeri poceli igrati moderatora/admina sto skroz nije fer i nije uopste realno.
Iskreno svaki svoj zavrseni hit odkako ima opcija retrospektive sam pogledao da vidim gdje grijesim i da li grijesim i gdje drugi grijese i da li rade isto kao ja sto je sasvim logicno :)
bakeer1337
Posts197
Member Since23 Feb 2016
Last Visit10 Mar 2018
Likes Given191
Likes Received441/169

#3959 by true_hiker » Wed Dec 14, 2016 12:36

danas ni quid ne može do kraja
true_hiker
Posts871
Member Since27 Dec 2015
Last Visit24 Sep 2019
Likes Given94
Likes Received1,849/800

#3960 by pupijevi » Wed Dec 14, 2016 14:49

Update: Job Retrospectives 2016-12-14 19:37:29 UTC, Kristen Hohenstein
Hello everyone,
We’ve changed something about job retrospectives. You’ll now only receive a retrospective if you answered Yes, but 2 other people in your job group answered No. In addition to this, you will only be able to view job groups you received a retrospective email for.
This change is being made because we saw retrospectives being used in ways that weren’t constructive. People were using the links to look at any job group they’ve ever participated in, even if they didn’t receive a retrospective for it. This created a hunt for “yes workers” to report to Rainforest admin in the forum. While the desire to help Rainforest admin root out cheaters is noble in principle, the way it was happening created a lot of division and tension in the forums. People were being accused of being yes workers when in fact some weren’t, and they were often belittled for making honest mistakes. This isn’t constructive. In addition to this, retrospectives in their current state are only meant to be a learning tool — there is no efficient way for us to manually look into every person accused of being a yes worker in the forum threads dedicated to his topic.
Moving forward, continue to refrain from posting about job retrospectives in the forum. The topic will be flagged and deleted. However, not all is lost! We are brainstorming ways to enable testers to review other testers’ work and flag suspicious results. Whatever solution we come up with will respect the privacy of all testers involved and enable us to efficiently gather and act on the suspicious test results that you flag.
As always, thank you all for being awesome!
pupijevi
Posts3,372
Member Since8 Feb 2015
Last VisitToday
Likes Given1,650
Likes Received8,513/2,649
Return to 'Ex-Yugoslavia' Forum     Return to the forums index
All times displayed are EST - Server Time: Oct 16, 2019 22:27:25 EST